Saturday, August 1, 2015

Is Iran nuclear deal a good deal or bad?


Nuclear agreement between the P5+1 and the Iranian regime is done. Agreement which not only fails to block Tehran’s pathways to a nuclear bomb, but will provide it with tens of billions of dollars to add to its war chest. Mullahs will ultimately cheat on its agreement with world powers to build a nuclear weapon.
The agreement, with its relaxation of sanctions, means Obama is halfhearted in confronting Iranian sponsorship of so much of the violent chaos that is spreading across the Middle East.
The mullahs’ definite cheating and deception, the unfrozen assets that the regime will allocate to terrorism and the status of human rights in Iran.


Senator John McCain warned the nuclear agreement and releasing Iran’s frozen assets will allow this regime to strengthen its military and terrorist activities.
Nuclear program to be one of three pillars that will ensure the continuity of the control it established over Iranian regime with the 1979 revolution. The other two pillars are suppression of domestic dissent and the exportation of terrorism regionally and internationally.
The deal could put Iran on a path towards developing a nuclear bomb within 10 short years and Iran can promote mischief in the world, and that is what is disturbing, especially in the area of international terrorism.
Thick and thin, agreement will provide the regime in Tehran with a renewed opportunity to expand its financing of terrorists in Yemen, Syria and elsewhere. We see a deal that neglects in any way to address Iran’s providing arms and support for terrorists.
Much of the attention has focused on Iran’s increased ability to supply more and better arms to its proxies in the region, such as the Lebanese Shiite Muslim militia Hezbollah and Houthi rebels in Yemen, while continuing to prop up the government of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. Yet concern is growing over the possibility that Iran could use the ending of arms restrictions to enhance its own military capabilities.
So, cooperation with Mullah’s regime and trust them is historic mistake. US should coordinate more effectively the effort to interdict those weapons and to disrupt those activities.

Maryam Rajavi said: So long as the mullahs remain in power in Iran, Islamic fundamentalism will persist, mutate and spread. Regime change in Iran–through the courage and resolve of the Iranian people and the organized opposition–yanks at the root of the problem.

No comments:

Post a Comment