Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona who was seen as the most likely
Republican to vote for current Iran nuclear deal, said he wouldn’t back the
accord when Congress votes on it next month.
Sen. Flake was seen as the only Republican to back the Iran
nuclear agreement, but now he says he won’t vote for it. With this, President
Obama’s effort to establish a bipartisan support for his controversial Iran
nuclear deal was nothing other than an illusion.
Flake said in a statement that he cannot vote in support of
the deal, since the benefits of the deal is outweighed by several limitations
the proposed agreement places on Congress and future administrations in
responding to Iran’s nonnuclear behavior in the region.
Without Flake or other GOP’s support, the Obama
administration will face the Republican Party unanimously opposed to the deal.
This is not limited to GOP’s Sens. and Reps. The deal also
is opposed by a number of prominent Democrats, including the Sen. Schumer of
New York. Several congressional Democrats have also come out in support of the
agreement. Those have included Sens. Gillibrand of New York, Kaine of Virginia
and Feinstein of California.
Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee said Monday that Congress
should reject the Iran nuclear agreement, suggesting the deal won’t prevent
Tehran from getting a nuclear weapon.
Corker’s opposition to the Iran deal comes after Sen. Flake
and a number of Senate Democrats have come out in support for the agreement.
Corker, like Flake, suggested the deal ties Congress’s and
future administration’s hands on what it can do to push back against Iranian
non-nuclear activities, including support for terrorism or human rights
violations.
Congress is expected to vote next month on a
resolution disapproving of the deal. President Obama has promised a veto. To
override the veto, Republicans would need two-thirds of both houses of Congress
that means they would need 44 House Democrats and 13 Senate Democrats.
No comments:
Post a Comment